<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>error Archives - copyeditor.se</title>
	<atom:link href="https://copyeditor.se/tag/error/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://copyeditor.se/tag/error/</link>
	<description>Your professional help to improve your written English</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2024 14:30:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>[sic]—What&#8217;s that?</title>
		<link>https://copyeditor.se/sic-whats-that/</link>
					<comments>https://copyeditor.se/sic-whats-that/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2024 14:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[copyediting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[English]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vocabulary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[english]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[error]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mistake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quotation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sic]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://copyeditor.se/?p=2520</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Sic comes from Latin and means so, thus, in this manner. Sic erat scriptum means so written, thus it had been written. When quoting something, writers may use sic to indicate that a word or phrase that looks wrong is indeed an exact reproduction of the original—the mistake appears in the source. Quotations should always [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://copyeditor.se/sic-whats-that/">[sic]—What&#8217;s that?</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://copyeditor.se">copyeditor.se</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p><strong>Sic</strong> comes from Latin and means <strong><em>so, thus, in this</em></strong><em><strong> manne</strong>r.</em></p>



<p><strong>Sic erat scriptum</strong>  means <em><strong>so written, thus it had been written</strong></em>.</p>



<p>When quoting something, writers may use <strong>sic</strong> to indicate that a word or phrase that looks wrong is indeed an exact reproduction of the original—the mistake appears in the source. Quotations should always be in their original form.</p>



<p><strong>Sic</strong> is usually written in square brackets:<strong> [sic]</strong>. The word <strong>sic</strong> is often seen as a loanword that does not require italics, but in the United States, <strong>sic</strong> is usually italicized.</p>



<p><strong>Sic</strong> can be used to mark an actual error or misprint or a conspicuous detail in the text, a word that seems odd or erroneous.</p>



<p>Since <strong>sic</strong> is used to draw the reader’s attention to a mistake by the writer, it often indicates disapproval and may signal superciliousness or be condescending. You should use caution when writing <strong>[sic]</strong> in order not to sound haughty or malicious.</p>



<p>There<strong> [sic]</strong> son had graduated from Cambridge.<br>The correct spelling is, of course, their.</p>



<p>She carries out research at the John<strong> [sic]</strong> Hopkins University.<br>This is a common error. The correct name is Johns Hopkins University, named after the entrepreneur and benefactor Johns Hopkins. His great-grandmother’s name was Margaret Johns; she married Gerard Hopkins and they named their son, the benefactor’s grandfather, Johns Hopkins. His grandson had the same name.</p>



<p></p>



<p>You can find a number of Latin abbreviations used in English <a href="https://copyeditor.se/some-other-latin-abbreviations-in-english/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">here</a>.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://copyeditor.se/sic-whats-that/">[sic]—What&#8217;s that?</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://copyeditor.se">copyeditor.se</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://copyeditor.se/sic-whats-that/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Regarding regards</title>
		<link>https://copyeditor.se/regarding-regards/</link>
					<comments>https://copyeditor.se/regarding-regards/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2019 11:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[English]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phrase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[concerning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyediting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[error]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[språkgranskning]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://copyeditor.se/?p=398</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The phrase *in regards to (with a plural -s) seems to appear frequently (for the use of the asterisk read the comment at the end of this text). Even if it is common in texts by both native and non-native English writers, it is not correct. When you want to refer to something, you can [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://copyeditor.se/regarding-regards/">Regarding regards</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://copyeditor.se">copyeditor.se</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>The phrase<strong> *in regards to</strong> (with a plural -s) seems to appear frequently (for the use of the asterisk read the comment at the end of <a href="https://copyeditor.se/good-and-bad-english/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">this</a> text). Even if it is common in texts by both native and non-native English writers, it is not correct.</p>



<p>When you want to refer to something, you can write <strong>in regard to</strong> or <strong>with regard to</strong>. Both phrases mean <strong>concerning</strong>. However, you have other alternatives:</p>



<p>regarding<br>in this regard<br>as regards<br>in respect of<br>with respect to<br>with reference to<br>relating to<br>on the subject of<br>in connection with<br>concerning<br>about<br>as for<br>re</p>



<p>Read about <strong>with respect to</strong> and <strong>in respect of</strong> <a href="https://copyeditor.se/?s=respect" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">here</a>.</p>



<p>The verb <strong>regard</strong> can also mean <strong>look at, have or show respect for, think of with a particular feeling</strong>. The corresponding noun is used in phrases like the following:</p>



<p>I have great regard for his work.<br>Give my regards to your family. <br>Best regards.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://copyeditor.se/regarding-regards/">Regarding regards</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://copyeditor.se">copyeditor.se</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://copyeditor.se/regarding-regards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: copyeditor.se @ 2026-08-24 16:09:43 by W3 Total Cache
-->